Modified directly observed antiretroviral therapy compared with self-administered therapy in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients: a randomized trial

Citation: Gross R, Tierney C, Andrade A, Lalama C, Rosenkranz S, Eshleman SH, Flanigan T, Santana J, Salomon N, Reisler R, Wiggins I, Hogg E, Flexner C, Mildvan D; AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5073 Study Team. Modified directly observed antiretroviral therapy compared with self-administered therapy in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients: a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jul 13;169(13):1224-32. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.172.

Access full article:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19597072

BACKGROUND:
Success of antiretroviral therapy depends on high rates of adherence, but few interventions are effective. Our objective was to determine if modified directly observed therapy (mDOT) improves initial antiretroviral success.

METHODS:
In an open-label, randomized trial comparing mDOT (Monday-Friday for 24 weeks) and self-administered therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir soft gel capsules (800 mg/200 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and either extended-release stavudine (100 mg) or tenofovir (300 mg), all taken once daily, 82 participants received mDOT and 161, self-administered therapy. Participant eligibility included a plasma human immunodeficiency virus RNA level higher than 2000 copies/mL and being naïve to antiretroviral therapy. A total of 243 participants were predominantly male (79%) (median age, 38 years), with 84 Latinos (35%), 74 non-Latino blacks (30%), and 79 non-Latino whites (33%). The study was conducted at 23 AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) sites in the United States and 1 site in South Africa between October 2002 and January 2006. The primary outcome was virologic success at week 24 and secondary outcomes were virologic success, clinical progression, and adherence at week 48.

RESULTS:
Over 24 weeks, mDOT had greater virologic success (0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 0.95) than self-administered therapy (0.84; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.89), but the difference (0.07; lower bound 95% CI, -0.01) did not reach the prespecified threshold of 0.075. Over 48 weeks, virologic success was not significantly different between mDOT (0.72; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.81) and self-administered therapy (0.78; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.84) (difference, -0.06; 95% CI, -0.18 to 0.07 [P = .19]).

CONCLUSIONS:
The potential benefit of mDOT was marginal and not sustained after discontinuation. Modified DOT should not be incorporated routinely for care of treatment-naïve human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00036452.

Categories

CRS
Topics

Clinical Trials

NWCS 414, Evaluation of a Serum Biosignature for Identifying...

We will address our hypothesis using a case-control study design. We plan to leverage the existing biorepository of...

Read More

A5273: Multicenter Study of Options for Second-Line...

The study is being done with people who are taking their first anti-HIV drug regimen (including an Non-Nucleoside Reverse...

Read More

A5282: A Randomized, Phase II Trial to Compare an HPV...

The investigators are looking for a better way to prevent cervical cancer. This study is comparing two different methods to...

Read More

A5128: Consent for Use of Stored Patient Specimens for...

The purpose of this study is to obtain informed consent to use stored human biological materials (HBM) (e.g., blood and other...

Read More

A5300/P2003: PHOENIx Feasibility Study

Study of MDR TB Cases and Their Household Contacts: Operational Feasibility to Inform PHOENIx Trial Design

Read More