The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and mucosal responses to maraviroc-containing PrEP regimens in MSM

Citation: McGowan I, Wilkin T, Landovitz RJ, Wu C, Chen Y, Marzinke MA, Hendrix CW, Richardson P, Eshleman SH, Andrade A, Chege W, Anderson PL, Mccauley M, Farley J, Mayer KH, Anton P, Brand RM, Cranston RD, Gulick R. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and mucosal responses to maraviroc-containing PrEP regimens in MSM. AIDS 2018 Dec 13. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002038. PMCID pending

Access full article:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30557160

OBJECTIVE:
HIV Prevention Trials Network 069/AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5305 was a study of 48-week oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) regimens in MSM and transgender women. A rectal substudy was included to evaluate drug concentrations in rectal compartment vs. blood, gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) responses to four antiretroviral PrEP regimens [maraviroc (MVC), MVC + emtricitabine (FTC), MVC + tenofovir (TFV) disoproxil fumarate, and TFV disoproxil fumarate + FTC], and to determine whether ARV exposure was associated with ex-vivo suppression of HIV infection in colorectal explants.

METHODS:
C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) genotype was characterized using PCR. At baseline and at Weeks 24, 48, and 49, GALT phenotype was characterized by flow cytometry, rectal biopsies were challenged with HIV-1BaL, and tissue and plasma pharmacokinetics were measured via mass spectrometry.

RESULTS:
Exposure to MVC was not associated with increased expression of CD4/CCR5 HIV target T cells. Significant ex-vivo viral suppression compared with baseline was seen at Weeks 24 and 48, ranging from 1.4 to 1.8 log10 for all study regimens except the MVC-alone arm which did not show statistically significant viral suppression at Week 48. Tissue concentrations of TFV, TFV-diphosphate, and FTC were correlated with viral suppression.

CONCLUSION:
MVC-containing HIV PrEP regimens did not increase GALT CD4 T-cell activation or the CD4/CCR5 phenotype. No virologic suppression was seen with MVC-alone at Week 48 compared with combination regimens, suggesting MVC monotherapy might be less effective than combination antiretroviral PrEP regimens.

Categories

CRS
Topics

Clinical Trials

P1078: A Phase IV Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled...

P1078 is a Phase IV, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of HIV-infected pregnant women and the infants born to...

Read More

P1108: A Phase I/II, Open-Label, Single Arm Study to...

This purpose of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of bedaquiline (BDQ) in...

Read More

The Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Acceptability of New...

PK, safety and acceptability data and practical guidance on the optimal dosing of new more child-friendly formulations of...

Read More

HPTN083: A Phase 2b/3 Double Blind Safety and Efficacy Study...

HPTN 083 is a study being done to evaluate the efficacy of the long-acting injectable agent, cabotegravir (CAB LA), for...

Read More

A5290, A Randomized, Phase 2b Study of a Double-Dose...

Rifampin (RIF), the cornerstone of TB treatment, has very problematic drug-drug interactions with PIs. The use of relatively...

Read More