Pregnancy differentially impacts performance of latent tuberculosis diagnostics in a high-burden setting

Citation: Mathad JS, Bhosale R, Sangar V, Mave V, Gupte N, Kanade S, Nangude A, Chopade K, Suryavanshi N, Deshpande P, Kulkarni V, Glesby MJ, Fitzgerald D, Bharadwaj R, Sambarey P, Gupta A. Pregnancy differentially impacts performance of latent tuberculosis diagnostics in a high-burden setting. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 21;9(3):e92308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092308. eCollection 2014. PMID: 24658103. PMCID: PMC3962385. 

Access full article:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24658103

BACKGROUND:

Targeted screening for latent TB infection (LTBI) in vulnerable populations is a recommended TB control strategy. Pregnant women are at high risk for developing TB and likely to access healthcare, making pregnancy an important screening opportunity in developing countries. The sensitivity of the widely-used tuberculin skin test (TST), however, may be reduced during pregnancy.

METHODS:

We performed a cross-sectional study comparing the TST with the QuantiFERON Gold In-tube (QGIT) in 401 HIV-negative women presenting antepartum (n = 154), at delivery (n = 148), or postpartum (n = 99) to a government hospital in Pune, India. A subset of 60 women enrolled during pregnancy was followed longitudinally and received both tests at all three stages of pregnancy.

RESULTS:

The QGIT returned significantly more positive results than the TST. Of the 401 women in the cross-sectional study, 150 (37%) had a positive QGIT, compared to 59 (14%) for the TST (p<0.005). Forty-nine (12%) did not have their TST read. Of 356 who had both results available, 46 (13%) were concordant positive, 91 (25%) were discordant (12 (3%) TST+/QGIT-; 79 (22%) TST-/QGIT+), and 206 (57%) concordant negative. Comparison by stage of pregnancy revealed that QGIT percent positivity remained stable between antepartum and delivery, unlike TST results (QGIT 31-32% vs TST 11-17%). Median IFN-γ concentration was lower at delivery than in antepartum or postpartum (1.66 vs 2.65 vs 8.99 IU/mL, p = 0.001). During postpartum, both tests had significantly increased positives (QGIT 31% vs 32% vs 52%, p = 0.01; TST 17% vs 11% vs 25%, p<0.005). The same trends were observed in the longitudinal subset.

CONCLUSIONS:

Timing and choice of LTBI test during pregnancy impact results. QGIT was more stable and more closely approximated the LTBI prevalence in India. But pregnancy stage clearly affects both tests, raising important questions about how the complex immune changes brought on by pregnancy may impact LTBI screening.

PLoS One. 2014 Mar21;9(3):e92308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092308. eCollection 2014. PubMed PMID: 24658103; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3962385

Categories

CRS
Topics

Clinical Trials

NWCS 414, Evaluation of a Serum Biosignature for Identifying...

We will address our hypothesis using a case-control study design. We plan to leverage the existing biorepository of...

Read More

A5384: A Phase II, Randomized, Open-Label Trial of a...

Study Description A5384 is a trial for people who have or might have tuberculous meningitis (TBM). TBM is an infectious disease...

Read More

HPTN 069: A Phase II Randomized, Double-Blind, Study of the...

HPTN 069 is a phase II, four-arm, multisite, randomized, double-blinded trial. To assess the safety and tolerability of four...

Read More

P2001 (DAIDS ID 12026): Evaluating the Pharmacokinetics,...

TB is a major cause of illness and death in women of reproductive age. Pregnant and postpartum women with latent TB are at...

Read More

A5290, A Randomized, Phase 2b Study of a Double-Dose...

Rifampin (RIF), the cornerstone of TB treatment, has very problematic drug-drug interactions with PIs. The use of relatively...

Read More