Screening for pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-infected individuals: AIDS Clinical Trials Group protocol A5253

Citation: Swindells S, Komarow L, Tripathy S, Cain KP,  MacGregor RR, Achkar JM, Gupta A, Veloso VG, Asmelash A,  Omoz-Oarhe AE, Gengiah S, Lalloo U, Allen R, Shiboski C, Anderson J, Qasba SS, Katzenstein DK for the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5253 Study Team. Screening for pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-infected individuals: AIDS Clinical Trials Group protocol A5253. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013 Apr;17(4):532-9. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.12.0737. PMID: 23485388. PMCID: PMC3923622.

Access full article:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23485388

BACKGROUND:

Improved tuberculosis (TB) screening is urgently needed for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected patients.

METHODS:

An observational, multi-country, cross-sectional study of HIV-infected patients to compare a standardized diagnostic evaluation (SDE) for TB with standard of care (SOC). SOC evaluations included TB symptom review (current cough, fever, night sweats and/or weight loss), sputum Ziehl-Neelsen staining and chest radiography. SDE screening added extended clinical signs and symptoms and fluorescent microscopy (FM). All participants underwent all evaluations. Mycobacterium tuberculosis on sputum culture was the primary outcome.

RESULTS:

A total of 801 participants were enrolled from Botswana, Malawi, South Africa, Zimbabwe, India, Peru and Brazil. The median age was 33 years; 37% were male, and median CD4 count was 275 cells/mm(3). Thirty-one participants (4%) had a positive culture on Löwenstein-Jensen media and 54 (8%) on MGIT. All but one positive culture came from sub-Saharan Africa, where the prevalence of TB was 54/445 (12%). SOC screening had 54% sensitivity (95%CI 40-67) and 76% specificity (95%CI 72-80). Positive and negative predictive values were respectively 24% and 92%. No elements of the SDE improved the predictive values of SOC.

CONCLUSIONS:

Symptom-based screening with smear microscopy was insufficiently sensitive. More sensitive diagnostic testing is required for HIV-infected patients.

BMJ. 2013 Jul 31;347:f4841. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4841. PubMed PMID: 23903456

Categories

CRS
Topics

Clinical Trials

A5290, A Randomized, Phase 2b Study of a Double-Dose...

Rifampin (RIF), the cornerstone of TB treatment, has very problematic drug-drug interactions with PIs. The use of relatively...

Read More

P2010: Phase III Study of the Virologic Efficacy and Safety...

IMPAACT 2010 is a Phase III, three-arm, randomized, open-label study of HIV-1-infected pregnant women initiating either a...

Read More

The Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Acceptability of New...

PK, safety and acceptability data and practical guidance on the optimal dosing of new more child-friendly formulations of...

Read More

NWCS 414, Evaluation of a Serum Biosignature for Identifying...

We will address our hypothesis using a case-control study design. We plan to leverage the existing biorepository of...

Read More

P1078: A Phase IV Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled...

P1078 is a Phase IV, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of HIV-infected pregnant women and the infants born to...

Read More